Home

ACAL/ACFFL Services

Southern California

Northern California

    FAQ'S

Birth Mother Expenses

Regarding Adoption

Regarding
    Assisted Reproduction
    Technology Law

Upcoming Events
    MCLE Seminars

 

FAQ's about Birth Mother Expenses


Standards For The Payment of Allowable and Appropriate
Expenses of Birth Mothers Under
California Penal Code Section 273

(Updated September 13, 2003)


The Statute: California Penal Code Section 273 provides in pertinent part:

      (a) It is a misdemeanor for any person or agency to offer to pay money or anything of value, or to pay money or anything of value to a parent for the placement for adoption, for the consent to an adoption, or for cooperation in the completion of an adoption of his child. This section does not make it unlawful to pay the maternity-connected medical or hospital and necessary living expenses of the mother preceding and during confinement as an act of charity, as long as the payment is not contingent upon placement of the child for adoption, consent to the adoption, or cooperation in the completion of the adoption.

      (b) It is a misdemeanor for any parent to obtain the financial benefits set forth in subdivision (a) with the intent to receive such financial benefits without completing the adoption or without consenting to the adoption.


     Rules or conditions of payment may be extracted from this statute. Those conditions of payment are that each expense must be:

  Maternity-connected;
Necessary;
Of the mother;
Preceding and during “confinement;”
An act of charity; and
Paid unconditionally.



The Problem: Interpreting these conditions is often difficult, for the statutory standards are less than clear. The result has been confusion, misunderstanding, and abuse of the adoption process. The Academy of California Adoption Lawyers (“ACAL”) has created the guidelines which follow, in order to create an atmosphere of greater legal certainty, discourage abuse of the adoption process, and to establish a yardstick of ethical conduct to which the courts may refer in order to determine whether the facts of individual cases suggest inappropriate conduct or abuse. These guidelines are based upon many years of experience and common sense. In the view of ACAL, the ultimate purpose of the statute is to make adoption a financially neutral option for the birth mother – she should not realize financial gain from the act of placing her child for adoption, nor should she suffer significant financial hardship as a result of that decision. There are some inherent inequities in our current statutory scheme, as is discussed below, but until the legislature addresses those inequities, the parties to an adoption must comply with the law in its current form.


The Guidelines:

Frequently Asked Questions

 


 

Who may be supported?

    The statute refers to expenses “of the mother”, therefore any financial assistance provided must be for her support. By extension, if a birth mother is under a legal duty to support another person, such as a child or a disabled husband, the amount of assistance provided to the birth mother should reflect that legal obligation. This is assistance to her, not to the third party she is supporting. In the absence of a legal obligation of support on the part of a birth mother, it is improper to support her boyfriend or other persons. If a birth mother is cohabiting with another person, the other person ought to be expected to pay an equitable share of common expenses such as rent, groceries, or utilities.

top of page ^

 

What is the duration of the financial assistance?

    The statute provides that assistance may be provided for the period “preceding and during confinement”. The terms “confinement” is undefined, and has never been interpreted in an reported decision. However, in all likelihood, a court would define “confinement” as “pregnancy related disability or unemployability”. Obstetricians generally consider a woman “disabled” for two (2) to six (6) weeks after delivery in the case of a normal vaginal delivery, or four (4) to eleven (11) weeks in the case of a caesarian delivery. Therefore, it is legally appropriate for adopting parents to assist with a birth mother’s expenses until her medical disability is ended, in the professional judgment of her physician.

Absent unusual and compelling circumstances, prenatal support should be limited to three (3) months. If a birth mother is employed, she should be encouraged to continue her employment until her treating physician recommends that she commence her maternity leave. If a birth mother is unemployed, and unable to obtain employment due to her pregnancy, it might be necessary and appropriate for financial assistance to start more than three (3) months prior to her expected delivery date. Discrimination against pregnant women in employment may be illegal, but it is rampant nonetheless, and these guidelines need to be flexibly applied to reflect this reality. The legality of the retroactive payment of maternity related expenses shall be scrutinized by an adoption attorney.

top of page ^

 

What expense items are allowable?

    Under the statue, only expenses “related to the pregnancy” may be paid. These would include maternity clothing, and the cost of such clothing will be dependent to some extent upon the state of the woman’s wardrobe at the time of conception. However, maternity clothing purchased or reimbursed by the adopting parents for the birth mother should not exceed $500.00, absent some compelling reason for a greater expenditure.

top of page ^

 

Housing

     Housing should be comfortable but unostentatious, and should not be unreasonably in excess of a birth mother’s accustomed lifestyle.

top of page ^

 

Groceries

    It is also appropriate for adopting parents to assist with groceries and sundries, the cost of which should not exceed $400.00 per month for a woman living alone, or $500.00 per month if she has a child to feed as well.

top of page ^

 

Transportation

    Transportation expenses may be payable as well. If a woman is to travel to California to give birth and place a child for adoption, it is appropriate for adopting parents to pay her travel expenses, including a return ticket after the adoption. A birth mother also needs transportation to and from doctor and counseling appointments; thus assistance with a bus pass or payment of actually incurred taxi fares is permissible.

top of page ^

 

Cars and Transportation

    An adopting parent may not under any circumstances buy a car for a birth parent, since the purchase of a car is not a “maternity connected” expense under the statute. However, if a birth mother is making payments upon a pre-existing car loan, the adopting parents may assist with those payments for the limited duration sent forth in Section B, above. This assistance may also extend to her gasoline, automobile insurance expense, and car repairs necessary to keep the vehicle safely operable, provided it can be characterized as a minor repair and not an improvement or enhancement of the vehicle. It is also proper to rent a car for a birth mother’s use for the limited time set forth above. Generally, transportation expenses are payable only for the birth mother and those persons she is under a legal obligation to support, and the adopting parents ought not to be asked or expected to pay or reimburse for transportation for other persons. However, if a birth mother is traveling a distance to give birth it is appropriate to assist with travel expenses for her mother, older sister, or other individual who is the birth mother’s primary emotional support person.

top of page ^

 

Dental

    Routine dental care may properly be provided to a birth mother during her “confinement” at the expense of the adopting parents. This does not extend to bridges, crowns, orthodontia work, or other corrective dental work unrelated to the pregnancy.

top of page ^

 

Furniture

    If a birth mother needs furniture, this should be dealt with through rental of furniture. It is not proper to give a birth mother tangible long-term assets such as furniture or a car, for this is clearly beyond the allowed scope of expenses under the statute.

top of page ^

 

Moving/Relocation

    If placement of a child for adoption necessitates a move by a birth mother, reasonable moving expenses may be properly be paid by the adopting parents, but only when the move is one of necessity rather than of convenience. This applies to storage of a birth mother’s belongings as well.

top of page ^

 

Other Income

    In determining what living expenses are reasonable and necessary, other sources of income available to the birth mother should be considered.

top of page ^

 

Loans to Birth Mothers

    A loan is something of value, and the statute applies to payment of “anything of value”, therefore a loan to a birth mother is proper only if it meets all of the tests set forth in the statute. The loan also must be disclosed in the Account Report filed with the court pursuant to Family Code Section 8610. Loans to a birth mother ought to be avoided as it is highly undesirable to create a debtor/creditor relationship between the parties to an adoption.

top of page ^

 

Loss of Income

    Penal Code Section 273 allows assistance with “expenses”; loss of income is not an expense. Therefore, adopting parents may not reimburse a birth mother her loss of income occasioned by the pregnancy. In most cases, the income would be used to pay necessary living expenses anyway, so if adopting parents pay the living expenses of a birth mother as well as reimburse her loss of income, they will in effect be reimbursing her twice–once for her living expenses and once for her lost income which would amount to double payment. However, if a birth mother is earning substantially more than she spends on living expenses, nonpayment of her loss of income may have an inequitable impact which is unfortunately unavoidable under the current wording of the statute.

top of page ^

 

Purpose of Guidlines

    The Academy of California Adoption Lawyers (“ACAL”) has prepared these guidelines to discourage abuse of the adoption process and create a greater degree of certainty as to the application of Penal Code Section 273. The Academy urges the courts to examine closely the Adoption Expenses Report filed in every adoption in compliance with Family Code Section 8610. Variations from these guidelines may be necessary or warranted by the facts of an occasional case.

The Adoption Request/petition ought to be granted if the Court is satisfied that doing so is in the best interests of the child. The membership of the Academy of California Adoption Lawyers takes ethical adoption seriously and invites the Court and others interested to the member nearest you with any questions or input.

A list of all members can be found at:

Southern California Members
     Northern California Members

 

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be legal advice. You should, and must consult an attorney of your own selection for individual advice regarding your particular situation.

All potential clients are advised to carefully select their own legal counsel. Neither the officers, directors nor any members of the Academy take responsibility for or are involved with the separate law practices of the other ACAL and ACFFL ATTORNEYS.

top of page ^

 

© 2008 Academy of California Adoption Lawyers & it's subsidiary ACFFL

Designed and maintained by Flair For Design